Living collections and living reenactments have become popular features in museums, historical sites, and heritage centers. These attractions involve the use of live animals, plants, or people to recreate historical events, cultural traditions, or natural environments. While they can enhance the educational experience for visitors, there are also several complications that arise with having living collections and living reenactments.

One of the main complications is the cost associated with maintaining these collections and reenactments. Living collections require ongoing care, which can be expensive and time-consuming. For example, zoos and botanical gardens need to provide food, shelter, and medical care for their animals and plants, which can be a significant financial burden. Similarly, living reenactments require trained staff, costumes, and props, all of which come at a cost. This expense can limit the resources available for other museum activities, such as research, conservation, or outreach programs.

Another challenge is the ethical concerns raised by the use of live animals and plants. Many living collections involve rare or endangered species that may be stressed or harmed by captivity. In addition, the conditions in which these animals and plants are kept may not be adequate for their physical and psychological well-being. Living reenactments that involve human performers can also raise ethical questions, particularly if they are required to perform physically demanding or dangerous activities. This can create a tension between the educational value of living collections and the responsibility to protect the welfare of the living beings involved.

A third complication is the potential for accidents or injuries to occur. Living collections and reenactments involve inherent risks, such as animal attacks or plant toxicity, which can pose a danger to visitors or staff. In addition, reenactments that involve firearms or other weapons can pose a risk of injury or even death. This can create legal and financial liabilities for the museum or heritage center, as well as damage to its reputation.

Finally, the use of living collections and reenactments can also raise questions about cultural sensitivity and authenticity. For example, reenactments of historical events may involve stereotypes or inaccuracies that offend or misrepresent certain cultures or communities. Similarly, the use of live animals and plants may reflect a Western-centric view of nature and conservation that ignores the knowledge and practices of Indigenous or local communities. This can undermine the educational value of living collections and reenactments and create a barrier to engaging with diverse audiences.

In conclusion, while living collections and reenactments can enhance the educational experience for visitors, they also pose several complications for museums, historical sites, and heritage centers. These challenges include the high cost of maintenance, ethical concerns for the welfare of living beings involved, risks of accidents and injuries, and potential for cultural insensitivity or misrepresentation. As such, careful consideration and planning are necessary to ensure that living collections and reenactments are both educational and responsible.

 Historic Huguenot Street’s Revolutionary War Reenactment (New Paltz, New York; 2016)

Question: What are some ways that museums and heritage centers can address the complications associated with living collections and reenactments?

2 Thoughts to “Complications of Living Collections & Reenactments”

  1. Rose Thao

    Great explanation on complications of living collections! I hand’t thought about the potential risks for accidents or injuries to occur as a complication to maintaining live collections. I think a way museums and heritage centers can address the complications associated with living museums and reenactment is to ensure that protocols are made and that indigenous perspectives are also acknowledged.

  2. Korovin Ellis

    I think that in the particular case of how reenactments portray indigenous groups, the best way to ensure accuracy is to open a dialog with the indigenous group being presented and even potentially allow members of that community to take part in or train the performers directly to ensure the portray of the event is as accurate as possible, as well as discussing which events can and should be reenacted, as the indigenous group should have a say in what parts of their past they are comfortable with outsiders portraying.

Leave a Comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.